Backwards e blogo software#
Ultimately, pushing the limits on a humanoid robot like Atlas drives hardware and software innovation that translates to all of our robots at Boston Dynamics. Ultimately, pushing the limits on a humanoid robot like Atlas drives hardware and software innovation that translates to all of our robots at Boston Dynamics.”
At the same time, our control team has to create algorithms that can reason about the physical complexity of these machines to create a broad set of high energy and coordinated behavior. “Their combination of size and complexity creates hardware design tradeoffs related to strength to weight ratio, runtime, range of motion, and physical robustness. “From a technical perspective, humanoids present several challenges that we welcome as a research team,” he adds. They may not be the best design for any particular task, but if you wanted to build one platform that could perform a wide variety of physical tasks, we already know that a human form factor is capable of doing that.” “First, they capture our vision of a go-anywhere, do-anything robot of the future. “Humanoids are interesting from a couple perspectives,” Kuindersma says. If robots can eventually respond to their environments with the same level of dexterity as the average adult human, the range of potential applications will be practically limitless. (Atlas is a research platform, not a commercial product.) But it doesn’t take a great deal of imagination or sector-specific knowledge to see why it would be helpful for Atlas to be able to perform the same range of movements and physical tasks as humans. In short: Why parkour? BUILDING A FOUNDATIONĪ robot’s ability to complete a backflip may never prove useful in a commercial setting. Why does it matter if Atlas stutters when it pumps its fist? Why does it matter if it pumps its fist at all, for that matter? And while we’re asking questions, what exactly is the use of running the robots through an obstacle course? Why the banked plywood panels, why the vault, why the backflips? But it also raises a question that at first seems surprising, but then seems obvious: Why does it matter? The perfectionism on display here is admirable, and one gets the sense that this sort of attention to detail is what has produced robots that are capable of completing such a futuristic, impossible-seeming routine. We’re going to swap in a behavior we’ve tested before so we have some confidence it will work.” “If you watch the video closely, it looks a little awkward. “We hadn’t run that behavior after the backflip before today, so that was really an experiment,” says Scott Kuindersma, the Atlas team lead at Boston Dynamics. But the Atlas team notices every detail and they want to get it right. It was just the slightest stutter step, something most people watching the video would never notice. The robot did pump its arm, but it also stumbled a bit on this simple move. After the robots completed their backflips, one was supposed to pump its arm like a big-league pitcher after a game-ending strikeout – a move that the Atlas team calls the “Cha-Ching.”
Although this most recent attempt was nearly perfect, it was not precisely perfect, not quite. Moments after the cameras cut they’re huddled together, making changes before the next take. Both landed two perfectly synchronized backflips, and the video team has captured every move.Īnd yet, the robotics engineers who have been working on this routine for months barely take time to celebrate. The second robot leapt onto a balance beam and followed the same steps in reverse, and then the first robot vaulted over the beam.
Backwards e blogo series#
The first of the two robots ran up a series of banked plywood panels, broad jumped a gap, and ran up and down stairs in the course set up on the second floor of the Boston Dynamics headquarters. For the first time today, both Atlas robots have completed the complex obstacle course flawlessly.
0 kommentar(er)
